American History

Washington: A Life – Ron Chernow

Washington: A Life – by Ron Chernow
Recommendation: 9/10. Date read: 4/27/21.

The definitive biography of George Washington. Chernow tracks the entirety of Washington’s celebrated life from childhood to his early experiences in the French and Indian War, and eventually through his role as commander of the Continental Army and years serving as American’s first president. The depth of Washington’s life is awe-inspiring. At every turn, he demonstrated an ability to make difficult decisions by relying on his strong moral compass during turbulent times when outcomes were far from certain—especially through the American Revolution and the early years of a newly formed government. He was a deeply private figure, cloaking himself in mystery despite the fame that followed him in later life. Although reluctant to accept political roles he found his way into, he was purposeful in his every move—a true statesman who put the wellbeing of the nation over his desire for a quiet life.

See my notes below or Amazon for details and reviews.

My Notes:

Cloak yourself in mystery:
“An important element in Washington’s leadership both as a military commander and as President was his dignified, even forbidding, demeanor, his aloofness, the distance he consciously set and maintained between himself and nearly all the rest of the world.” W.W. Abbot

Washington often focused on learning the maximum about other people’s thoughts while revealing the minimum about his own.

“Let all men know thee, but no man know thee thoroughly.” Benjamin Franklin

Washington possessed the gift of silence and had great self-command. Exerted more power by withholding opinions than by expressing them. His public role led him to create a barrier that prevented intimacy with all but a few. This secrecy and evasion allowed him to avoid compromising his position and alerting the enemy to weaknesses during the American Revolution when he was (almost always) deficient of men, munitions, and supplies.

Character:
“With command of his tongue and temper, he had the supreme temperament for leadership compared to his scheming rivals. It was perhaps less his military skills than his character that eclipsed all competitors. Washington was dignified, circumspect, and upright, whereas his enemies seemed petty and skulking.” RC

At the end of the American Revolution, Washington resigned his position and return to privacy at Mount Vernon. “The figure hurrying back to his long-forgotten past had just accomplished something more extraordinary than any military feat during the war. At war’s end, he stood alone at the pinnacle of power, but he never became drunk with that influence, as had so many generals before him, and treated his commission as a public trust to be returned as soon as possible to the people’s representatives. Throughout history victorious generals had sought to parlay their fame into political power, whereas Washington had only a craving for privacy. Instead of glorying in his might, he feared its terrible weight and potential misuse.” RC

“He brought maturity, sobriety, judgment, and integrity to a political experiment that could easily have grown giddy with its own vaulted success, and he avoided the backbiting, envy, and intrigue that detracted from the achievements of other founders.” RC

Purposeful:
Young Washington was adventurous (swimming, riding, hunting, fencing) and combined this with an ability to master social etiquette, enabling him to climb the ladder of high society. “He was an unusually sober and purposeful young man.” RC

Moral compass:
“George Washington possessed the gift of inspired simplicity, a clarity and purity of vision that never failed him. Whatever petty partisan disputes swirled around him, he kept his eyes fixed on the transcendent goals that motivated his quest. As sensitive to criticism as any other man, he never allowed personal attacks or threats to distract him, following an inner compass that charted the way ahead.” RC

Decision making:
“Always fearful of failure, Washington wanted to push ahead only if he was armed with detailed knowledge and enjoyed a high likelihood of success. This cautious, disciplined political style would persist long after the original insecurity that had prompted it had disappeared.”

The French and Indian War:
Taught Washington invaluable lessons in frontier warfare which the Indians demonstrated so well—mobile style of warfare that relied on ambushing, sniping from trees, and vanishing into the forest. His defeat on the frontier came be seen as a doomed but heroic defense rather than a military blunder.

“Some men will gain as much experience in the course of three or four years as some will in ten or a dozen.” Washington


“It was this process of subtle, silent, unrelenting self-criticism that enabled him to rise above his earthly defeats.” RC

Must undergo a hard winter training to develop true confidence:

“As a member of the British forces, he had begun to articulate a comprehensive critique of British fighting methods in North America. For a young man, he acquired an amazing amount of experience and these precocious achievements yielded a lasting reservoir of self-confidence. He had proved his toughness and courage in the face of massacres and defeats. He had learned to train and drill regiments and developed a rudimentary sense of military strategy. He had shown a real capacity to lead and take responsibility for fulfilling the most arduous missions. Perhaps, most important, his experience in the French and Indian War made him a believer in strong central government and a vigorous executive. Forced to deal with destructive competition, among the colonies, dilatory legislative committees, and squabbling, shortsighted politicians, he had passed an excellent dress rehearsal for the prolonged ordeal of the American Revolution.” RC

Skin in the game:
Part of the reason that Washington commanded such a deep respect from everyone throughout his life and career is because he was always willing to put himself in the heat of battle. He never shied away from the front lines.

“Washington was no remote leader but an active, rousing presence.” RC

“To obtain the applause of deserving men is a heartfelt satisfaction; to merit them is my highest wish.” Joseph Addison

American Revolution:
Great Britain was bad for local business, which created the unique situation and historical anomaly of a revolution inaugurated by affluent, conservative leaders.

Early on Washington learned to shift his strategy and wage a defensive war in order to keep the cause alive. See retreat from Long Island on page 250. See calamities at Forts Washington and Lee on page 264 (futility of trying to defend positions along seaboard and moved instead into countryside where mobility favored Continental Army).

Crossing the Delaware, 1776: Washington was more concerned about patriotic support tapering off and short enlistments that would allow most of his army to depart at the end of the year than he was about the strength of the British Army. Washington knew without a momentous victory and a daring strike, it would be difficult to inject energy into the cause. Washington and the army crossed the river in treacherous conditions and descended on Trenton. The battle was over in an hour. After this victory and the next at Princeton, the psychology of the war was dramatically reversed. Page 269.

“His military triumphs had been neither frequent nor epic in scale. He had lost more battles than he had won…But he was a different kind of general fighting a different kind of war…His fortitude in keeping the impoverished Continental Army intact was a major historic accomplishment.” RC

“In defining the culture of the Continental Army, he had helped to mold the very character of the country, preventing the Revolution from taking a bloodthirsty, or despotic turn.” RC

Missionaries > Mercenaries:
“The unconquerable resolution of our citizens, the conscious rectitude of our cause, and a confident trust that we should not be forsaken by heaven.” Washington

Moderation:
When Washington was appointed General and Commander in Chief, he acted as the glue that helped bind the colonies together. Hailing from Virginia, he knew how to bridge the North and South. “Many southerners feared that New Englanders were a rash, obstinate people, prone to extremism, and worried that an army led by a New England general might someday turn despotic and conquer the South. The appointment of George Washington would soothe such fears and form a perfect political compromise between North and South.” RC

“He also provided a conservative counterweight to some of the more unruly impulses of the American Revolution, ensuring incremental progress and averting the bloody excesses associated with the French Revolution.” RC

Second-order thinking:
“His overriding goal was to contrast his own humane behavior with the predatory ways of the enemy.” RC

Washington preached fair treatment of civilians, respect for private property, and doled out harsh punishment for anyone who violated this. “The spirit and willingness of the people must in a great measure take the place of coercion.” Washington

Presidency:
Not every decision you face will be a ‘hell yes.’ Washington was extremely reluctant to leave a sense of privacy and peacefulness at Mount Vernon to take on the challenges facing the country. He had serious doubts. The way he rationalized it was that he felt he could serve a couple of years then bow out before he even finished his first term. If he knew he would have served 8 years, he likely wouldn’t have agreed to it.

“The presidency is the powerful office it is in large part because of Washington’s initial behavior. Washington had forged the executive branch of the federal government, appointed outstanding department heads, and set a benchmark for fairness, efficiency, and integrity that future administrations would aspire to match.” RC

American Nations - Colin Woodard

American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America – by Colin Woodard
Recommendation: 8/10. Date read: 7/28/20.

Challenges the perspective that the Americans are living through a uniquely divisive moment in time. Instead, Woodard suggests Americans have been deeply divided since the days of Jamestown and Plymouth. The original North American colonies were settled by people from distinct regions with unique religious, political, and ethnographic characteristics. Since the colonial period, the eleven rival regional cultures in North America have regarded one another as competitors for land, settlers, and capital. Woodard offers insight into why specific regions hold a particular set of beliefs, the power of early influence, and the dangers in blindly adopting ideologies. It’s a powerful book and source of perspective to help you navigate current events without getting trapped into a tribe mentality.

See my notes below or Amazon for details and reviews.


My Notes:

Illusion of Unity:
Americans have been deeply divided for centuries—original North American colonies were settlement by people from British Islands, France, the Netherlands, Spain. Each with distinct religious, political, and ethnographic characteristics. Saw the other as competition for land, settlers, and capital. 

“American’s most essential and abiding division are not between red and blue states…the United States is a federation comprised of the whole or part of eleven regional nations, so of which truly do not see eye to eye with one another.” CW

The 11 rival regional cultures: Yankeedom, Tidewater, Greater Appalachia, The Deep South, New Netherland, New France, The Midlands, First Nation, El Norte, The Far West, The Left Coast.

These regional cultures have been fundamental in shaping the way we think, as well as North American history, politics, and governance.

Power of Early Influence:
“Thus, in terms of lasting impact, the activities of a few hundred, or even a few score, initial colonizers can mean much more for the cultural geography of a place than the contributions of tens of thousands of new immigrants of a few generations later.” Wilbur Zelinsky

Goals in each region:
Early Yankeedom and Midlands—building a religious utopia.

New Netherland—individual freedoms of conscience, speech, religion, assembly.

New France—complex network of Indian alliances.

Chesapeake colonies (Tidewater)—recreate the genteel manor life of rural England in the New World.

Greater Appalachia—warrior culture, self-reliant, suspicious of outside authority, valued individual liberty and personal honor above all else.

Tidewater:
“Tidewater’s semifeudal model required a vast and permanent underclass to play the role of serfs, on whose toil the entire system depended. But from the 1670s onward, the gentry had an increasingly difficult time finding enough poor Englishmen willing to take on this role.” Slave traders offered a solution. Slave caste grew from 10% of Tidewater’s population in 1700 to 40% in 1760. 

“The south was not founded to create slavery; slavery was recruited to perpetuate the South.”

In the early years, Tidewater was settled largely by young, unskilled male servants.

Yankeedom:
Central myth of American history is that founders of Yankeedom were champions of religious freedom, fleeing religious persecution. Only true of a few hundred pilgrims (English Calvinists) in Cape Cod in 1620. Vast majority were Puritans who “forbade anyone to settle in their colony who failed to pass a test of religious conformity.”

“Early Yankeedom was less tolerant of moral or religious deviance than the England its settlers had left behind.”

Expectation that everyone should read the Bible required everyone to be literate. This led to a proliferation of schoolhouses and requirement that all children be sent to school. 

New Englanders always intended to rule themselves so they were never beholden to nobles or corporations. 

New England’s colonists were skilled craftsmen, lawyer, doctors. Came over as families. Gave them more of a normal distribution of age and gender ratios than other regions. Allowed their population to grow faster. 1660, Yankeedom population was around 60k (twice Tidewater). 

Deep South:
“From the outset, Deep Southern culture was based on radical disparities in wealth and power, with a tiny elite commanding total obedience and enforcing it with state-sponsored terror.” CW

“Most of the other nations were societies with slaves, not slave societies per se. Only in Tidewater and the Deep South did slavery become the central organizing principle of the economy and culture. “ CW

Civil War: If not for Deep Southerners attacks on federal post offices, mints, arsenals, and military bases in 1861, they might have negotiated a peaceful secession. Prior to South Carolina’s militia assault on Fort Sumter, Yankeedom lacked allies in its desire for force. This proved to be the catalyst that mobilized other regions who were previously disinterested coming to the aid of the North. 

Greater Appalachia:
Embraced a self-sufficient way of life, living off the land and moving every few years. Life in Britain taught them not to invest too much time and wealth in fixed property which was easily destroyed in time of war. 

“When they did need cash, they distilled corn into a more portable, storable, and valuable product: whiskey, which would remain the de facto currency of Appalachia for the next two centuries.” CW

“‘Hoosier’—a Southern slang term for a frontier hick—was adopted as a badge of honor by the Appalachian people of Indiana. 

A Common Struggle:
What brought these rival cultures was an effort to preserve their respective, culture, character, and power structure. “They were joined in a temporary partnership against a common thread: the British establishment’s ham-fisted attempt to assimilate them into a homogenous empire central controlled from London.” 

By the time England tried to impose uniformity and centralization of power, many of the regions were several generations old and had their own traditions, values, and interests. 

Articles of Confederation created more of a political entity (like the EU) that was a voluntary alliance of sovereign states. Not a nation state.

The Left Coast:
Gold rush, 1848: “In what was one of the largest spontaneous migrations in human history to that point, 300,000 arrived in California in just five years, increasing the new American territory’s non-Indian population twentyfold. Within twenty-four months San Francisco grew from a village of 800 to a city of 20,000.”

WW2:
Pearl Harbor united the regions together like never before. Borderlanders fought to avenge attack, Tidewater and Depp South wished to uphold national honor and defend Anglo-Norman brethren, Midlanders backed the war as a struggle against military despotism, Yankees/New Netherlanders/Left Coasters emphasize the anti-authoritarian aspect of the struggle. El Norte and the Far West embraced war which brought resources and investment to their long-neglected regions.

Hitler and Hirohito did more for the development of the Far West and El Norte than any other agent in their histories. Previously they were exploited as internal colonies. But during war were given industrial bases, shipyards, naval bases, aircraft plants, steel mills, nuclear weapons labs, test sites. 

Modern Day:
Nations of the Dixie bloc create policies to ensure they remain low-wage resource colonies controlled by a one-party political system which serves interests of a wealth elite. To keep wages low, make it difficult to organize unions. Taxes kept too low to support public schools, urban planning, land-use zoning. 

Foreign policy: Yankees = anti-interventionist, anti-imperial, idealistic, intellectual, seek foreign policies that will civilize the world, so they dominate Foreign Affairs Committee. Dixie-bloc = martial and honor bound, aim to dominate and focus on power, so they dominate the Armed Services Committee. 

Divergent approaches to economic development, tax policy, and social spending only increase tensions between the cultural blocs.